Home/Services/Fintech consulting

Financial technology advice from people who have to file with a regulator.

We advise banks, NBFCs, insurers and fintechs on the architecture, controls and delivery of financial systems: from real-time payments and credit decisioning to regulatory reporting and the modernisation of core platforms. Recommendations come with a first deliverable in thirty days, not a slide deck alone.

BFSI focus Architecture to delivery Regulatory-aware India-first
Consultants reviewing figures on a laptopFintech consulting
Practice areas

Five areas where architecture decides outcomes.

Our fintech work sits at the intersection of technology, risk and regulation. Each practice area is staffed by consultants who have delivered the systems they advise on, and each can be combined with our agentic pipeline and data engineering practices when the work moves from advice to build.

Payments & UPI-era architectures

Design and review of real-time payment stacks: switch integration, idempotent transaction handling, reconciliation, dispute management and the throughput and availability targets that instant payments impose on every downstream system.

  • Capacity and resilience reviews for peak-day volumes
  • Reconciliation and chargeback process design
  • API gateway, tokenisation and partner onboarding patterns

Lending & credit decisioning

Decision engines, policy rule management, bureau and alternate-data integration, and the model governance around scorecards. We separate what a rule decides, what a model scores and what an underwriter must see, so each can be audited independently.

  • Loan origination and underwriting workflow design
  • Champion-challenger frameworks for scorecards
  • Explainability and adverse-action documentation

Regulatory automation

Automation of recurring RBI and SEBI submissions and internal compliance reporting: data lineage from source to return, validation rules, maker-checker sign-off and an evidence pack for each filing. Agents can draft and cross-check; a compliance officer signs.

  • Return preparation pipelines with full lineage
  • Exception and variance analysis before submission
  • Audit-ready archive of every filed version

Core-system modernisation

Staged migration away from monolithic core banking, lending and policy-administration systems. We favour strangler-pattern decomposition with parallel runs and reconciliation over big-bang cut-overs, and we plan the data migration as its own workstream.

  • Domain decomposition and integration roadmap
  • Parallel-run and cut-over governance
  • Vendor evaluation and contract structuring

Risk & fraud analytics

Transaction monitoring, account-takeover detection, mule-account patterns and AML alert triage. We combine rule engines, statistical models and agent-assisted investigation so that analysts spend their time on cases that warrant it.

  • Alert tuning and false-positive reduction
  • Case-management workflow with evidence assembly
  • Model-risk documentation for monitoring models

Where agents fit

Across all five areas, we identify the steps that involve reading unstructured documents, drafting correspondence or triaging exceptions, and we specify how an agentic pipeline can take those steps under human control. See the agentic pipelines practice for how those builds are governed.

Agentic flow pipelines
Where we start

Typical problems, and the first thirty-day deliverable.

Advisory engagements begin with a fixed-scope, thirty-day piece of work that produces something your organisation can act on. The table shows the mapping we most often use.

Problem as usually describedWhat we do in the first 30 daysDeliverable
Payment failures and reconciliation breaks rise with volumeTrace a sample of failed and unreconciled transactions end to end; measure latency and error rates per hop; review idempotency and retry design.Payments resilience review with a prioritised remediation list Architecture
Credit decisions are slow and hard to explainMap the origination workflow, separate rules from scores from manual judgement, and quantify turnaround at each stage.Decisioning blueprint with a target-state workflow and governance model Lending
Regulatory returns take weeks and rely on a few peopleDocument lineage for one high-effort return, identify manual adjustments, and prototype the validation layer.Return automation design and a working prototype for one return Regulatory
Core system limits every new product launchInventory integrations and data dependencies, identify the first domain to extract, and estimate the migration effort.Modernisation roadmap with a first-domain business case Core
Fraud alerts overwhelm the investigation teamAnalyse alert outcomes, tune the highest-volume rules, and design an agent-assisted triage step with a human decision.Alert-tuning report and a triage pipeline specification Risk
Unclear where AI should be applied in the businessRun our readiness assessment with the finance, risk and technology functions.Prioritised use-case portfolio; see the AI transformation practice Advisory
Illustrative engagement

An anonymised example of a modernisation advisory.

Described in anonymised form to show sequence and controls; figures indicate the pattern rather than a specific client's results.

Lending platform modernisation for a mid-market NBFC

A lender with a growing secured-loan book ran origination, servicing and collections on a single ageing platform that made each new product a multi-month change. Over a thirty-day assessment we inventoried integrations, mapped data flows and identified origination as the first domain to extract. The subsequent programme introduced a new decisioning service alongside the existing core, ran both in parallel for a full quarter with daily reconciliation, and cut over by product line.

  • Regulatory returns were sourced from a governed data layer rather than from either core during the transition.
  • Underwriter overrides were logged with reasons from the first day, giving the risk committee evidence for policy changes.
  • Document reading and income-verification steps were later handed to an agentic pipeline with human sign-off.

How we work with your control functions

Every fintech engagement includes named counterparts in risk, compliance and internal audit from the first week. Design decisions that touch customer data, regulatory reporting or credit policy are documented in a decision log that those functions review before implementation begins.

  • Decision log shared with risk and compliance throughout
  • Data protection assessment for any change to personal data flows
  • Hand-over pack written for internal audit as well as operations

Describe the problem as your board hears it.

We will tell you within a week whether a thirty-day engagement can move it, and what the deliverable would be.